TYPE
IEPL
IEPL
IEPL connects the entry and exit through a controlled international link, with fewer sections relying on the public internet and a generally clearer path design. Its value is not a prominent single momentary test result, but reducing the impact of unpredictable routing changes on long-lived connections, file transfers, and continuous sessions when international paths are complex or public-network conditions fluctuate.
These routes suit remote work, sustained access to developer tools, long video conferences, and tasks that require stable sessions. Resource and operations costs are generally higher than for ordinary direct connections, so they should be prioritized for continuity-sensitive work. For a brief webpage visit, a nearby relay or direct route may be more suitable.
Entry
Dedicated Link
Exit
TYPE
RELAY
Relay Routes
A relay route first sends the connection to a selected entry or relay node, which then connects to the destination region. Its value lies in avoiding poor default paths between the local network and a remote exit, allowing the entry and exit segments to be managed separately. Relay does not necessarily mean a longer route; a well-positioned relay can clarify the cross-region path and make it easier to switch between carrier networks.
Relay routes suit everyday browsing, streaming, AI tools, and most work scenarios, balancing coverage, path control, and resource cost. Start with a relay exit in the same region as the destination, then compare nearby cities. If a route is unstable on the current network, switching to another entry path in the same region is usually easier to troubleshoot than moving directly to a distant region.
Entry
Relay
Exit
TYPE
DIRECT
Direct Routes
A direct route connects the local network directly to an exit node in the destination region without an additional relay arranged by the service. Its structure is simple and resource costs are relatively controllable, and it can provide a direct experience when the path from the local carrier network to the destination data center is favorable. Because more segments are determined by public routing, performance can vary significantly by region, access method, and time of use.
These routes suit ordinary web access, short sessions, and backup use within the same region. To determine whether direct access fits the task, look beyond city distance and check page loading, file transfers, and session persistence. If connections repeatedly rebuild or international routing changes, compare a relay or IEPL route in the same region.
Local Network
Public Internet Path
Exit